To determine and predict the success rate of various treatments in primarily infertile patients with the help of machine learning.

Authors

  • Dr. Manan S. Popat NidhiONE Lifesciences pvt ltd Author
  • Dr. Tanay Patel Author
  • Dr. Rutvi Patel Author
  • Dr. Dhwani Patel Author
  • Dr. Nilesh Kanzariya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22878683

Keywords:

Infertility, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Intrauterine Insemination (IUI), In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF), Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), Predictive Analytics, Reproductive Health

Abstract

Background: Infertility, defined as the inability to conceive after 12 months of 

regular unprotected sexual intercourse, impacts millions of humans globally. This 

condition not only challenges public health systems but also significantly affects 

psychological and social well-being. Current therapeutic approaches vary in 

accessibility and effectiveness, necessitating advancements in diagnostic and 

treatment modalities. Machine learning (ML), a subset of artificial intelligence, 

offers potential benefits in refining diagnostic accuracies and enhancing the 

efficacy of infertility treatments through personalized care and predictive 

analytics.

Methods: This study utilized machine learning algorithms to predict the success 

rates of specific infertility treatments, including Intrauterine Insemination (IUI), 

In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF), and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), among 

a sample of primarily infertile patients. Retrospective and prospective data 

spanning six months from 567 couples treated at Sunflower Hospital and Gayatri 

Hospital were analyzed. ML models such as Decision Trees, Logistic Regression, 

and XGBoost were applied, focusing on an array of predictive features including 

patient age, infertility duration, previous medical and treatment histories, among 

others. These features were rigorously selected based on their importance scores 

derived from the ML algorithms to optimize the predictive performance.

Results and Discussion: The application of machine learning models 

demonstrated significant potential in predicting the outcomes of infertility 

treatments. The Decision Tree model exhibited a prediction accuracy of 85.54% 

for IUI success rates, which was notably higher than the other models tested. For 

IVF and ICSI treatments combined, the XGBoost model achieved an accuracy of 

72.09%, indicating robust model performance in these more complex cases. 

These models were effective in handling multifaceted data and yielded insights 

that could assist in making informed clinical decisions. Notably, the Logistic 

Regression model displayed substantial accuracy improvements over traditional 

statistical methods, particularly in reducing the likelihood of false negatives, 

thereby ensuring that fewer patients undergoing viable treatments were 

incorrectly predicted to have poor outcomes.

Conclusions: Integrating machine learning into reproductive healthcare can substantially improve the precision of infertility treatment protocols, predict 

treatment successes more accurately, and increase the overall efficacy of 

interventions. This study underscores the transformative potential of ML in 

healthcare, providing a framework for future applications in infertility treatment 

and beyond. Continued research and development into these models are 

recommended to confirm their effectiveness across different demographic and 

geographical contexts and to explore their utility in other medical domains.substantially improve the precision of infertility treatment protocols, predict 

treatment successes more accurately, and increase the overall efficacy of 

interventions. This study underscores the transformative potential of ML in 

healthcare, providing a framework for future applications in infertility treatment 

and beyond. Continued research and development into these models are 

recommended to confirm their effectiveness across different demographic and 

geographical contexts and to explore their utility in other medical domains.

 

Author Biographies

  • Dr. Manan S. Popat, NidhiONE Lifesciences pvt ltd

    Managing Director at NidhiONE Lifesciences Pvt Ltd, Doctor of pharmacy 

  • Dr. Tanay Patel

    Doctor of pharmacy

  • Dr. Rutvi Patel

    IBD EXECUTIVE IN PHARMACEUTICAL EXPORT

  • Dr. Dhwani Patel

    BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT EXECUTIVE,  Doctor of pharmacy 

  • Dr. Nilesh Kanzariya

    GUIDE

References

1. World Health Organization: WHO. (2023, April 3). Infertility.

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility

2. Rosenthal, L. (2023, January 19). What is the Difference Between Primary and

Secondary Infertility? illume fertility. https://www.illumefertility.com/fertilityblog/what-is-the-difference-between-primary-and-secondary-infertility

3. Magdum, M., Chowdhury, M. a. T., Begum, N., & Riya, S. (2022). Types of Infertility

and Its Risk Factors among Infertile Women: A Prospective Study in Dhaka City.

Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 10(04), 158–168.

https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2022.104014

4. Clearblue. (2024, March 11). Secondary infertility: What it is, why it happens and how

to cope. https://www.clearblue.com/how-to-get-pregnant/secondary-infertility

5. Secondary infertility: Why does it happen? (2022, December 7). Mayo Clinic.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/infertility/expert-answers/secondaryinfertility/faq-20058272

6. World Health Organization. (2023). Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021

[Report]. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/366700/9789240068315-

eng.pdf?sequence=1

7. Bhattacharya, S., Harrild, K., Mollison, J., Wordsworth, S., Tay, C., Harrold, A.,

McQueen, D. B., Lyall, H., Johnston, L. M., Burrage, J., Grossett, S., Walton, H. J.,

Lynch, J., Johnstone, A., Kini, S., Raja, A., & Templeton, A. (2008). Clomifene citrate

or unstimulated intrauterine insemination compared with expectant management for

unexplained infertility: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. British Medical

Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 337(aug07 2), a716. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a716

8. Martínez, F., Racca, A., Rodríguez, I., & Polyzos, N. P. (2021). Ovarian stimulation for

oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update

(Print), 27(4), 673–696. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab008

9. Söderström‐Anttila, V., Wennerholm, U., Loft, A., Pinborg, A., Aittomäki, K.,

Romundstad, L. B., & Bergh, C. (2015). Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers,

children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update,

dmv046. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv046

10. Revised glossary on Assisted Reproductive Terminology (ART). (n.d.).

https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research-

%28srh%29/areas-of-work/fertility-care/ART-revised-glossary

11. Borght, M. V., & Wyns, C. (2018). Fertility and infertility: Definition and

epidemiology. Clinical Biochemistry, 62, 2–10.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012

12. Agarwal, A., Mulgund, A., Hamada, A., & Chyatte, M. (2015). A unique view on male

infertility around the globe. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology,

13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1

13. Buckett, W., & Bentick, B. (1997). The epidemiology of infertility in a rural population.

Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 76(3), 233–237.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.1997.tb07851.x

14. Professional, C. C. M. (n.d.). Infertility. Cleveland Clinic.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/16083-infertility

15. Deyhoul, N., Mohamaddoost, T., & Hosseini, M. (2017). Infertility-Related Risk

Factors: A Systematic review. International Journal of Women’s Health and

Reproduction Sciences, 5(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2017.05

16. Brazier, Y. (2023, December 22). Infertility in males and females.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/165748

17. Ejaculation Disorders | Center for Male Reproductive Medicine & Microsurgery.

(n.d.). https://maleinfertility.org/sexual-medicine/erectile-dysfunction-ed/ejaculationdisorders

18. Kumar, P., Kumar, N., Thakur, D., & Patidar, A. (2010). Male hypogonadism:

Symptoms and treatment. Agricultural Policy Paper, 1(3), 297.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0110-5558.72420

19. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism | Andrology Awareness Europe. (n.d.).

https://www.andrologyawareness.eu/hypogonadotropic-hypogonadism/

20. De Rosa, M., Zarrilli, S., Di Sarno, A., Milano, N., Gaccione, M., Boggia, B., Lombardi,

G., & Colao, A. (2003). Hyperprolactinemia in men: clinical and biochemical features

and response to treatment. Endocrine Journal, 20(1–2), 75–82.

https://doi.org/10.1385/endo:20:1-2:75

21. Krajewska-Kułak, E., & Sengupta, P. (2013). Thyroid function in male infertility.

Frontiers in Endocrinology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2013.00174

22. Sengupta, P., Dutta, S., Karkada, I. R., & Chinni, S. V. (2021). Endocrinopathies and

male infertility. Life (Basel), 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12010010

23. Ingleson, K. (2017, July 2). Klinefelter syndrome: What you need to know.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/318194

24. Facts about Hypospadias | CDC. (2023, June 28). Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/hypospadias.html

25. McIntosh, J. (2023, November 15). Everything you need to know about cystic fibrosis.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/147960

26. Goodman, E. (2021, April 7). What to know about radiation therapy.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/types-of-radiation-therapy

27. Koh, E., Sin, H., Fukushima, M., & Namiki, M. (2010). Azoospermia factor and male

infertility. Reproductive Medicine and Biology (Print), 9(3), 129–137.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-010-0055-4

28. Figure 1. Algorithm for azoospermia differential diagnosis. (n.d.). ResearchGate.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Algorithm-for-azoospermia-differentialdiagnosis_fig1_353300530

29. Campo, S., Campo, V., & Benagiano, G. (2012). Infertility and adenomyosis.

Obstetrics and Gynecology International (Online), 2012, 1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/786132

44. In vitro fertilisation (IVF). (2021). In Cambridge University Press eBooks (pp. 95–113).

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108881760.010

45. ART Success Rates | CDC. (n.d.). https://www.cdc.gov/art/artdata/index.html

46. Machine Learning textbook. (n.d.).

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/mitchell/ftp/mlbook.html

47. Naqa, I. E., & Murphy, M. J. (2015). What is machine learning? In Springer eBooks

(pp. 3–11). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18305-3_1

48. Peng, J., Jury, E. C., Dönnes, P., & Ciurtin, C. (2021). Machine Learning Techniques

for Personalised Medicine Approaches in Immune-Mediated Chronic Inflammatory

Diseases: Applications and Challenges. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.720694

49. Kanade, V. (2022, August 30). What is machine learning? Understanding types &

applications - Spiceworks. Spiceworks. https://www.spiceworks.com/tech/artificialintelligence/articles/what-is-ml/

50. Nasteski, V. (2017). An overview of the supervised machine learning methods.

Horizonti. Serija B. Prirodno-matematički, Tehničko-tehnološki, Biotehnički,

Medicinski Nauki I Zdravstvo (Print), 4, 51–62.

https://doi.org/10.20544/horizons.b.04.1.17.p05

51. Muhammad, I., & Zhu, Y. (2015). SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING

APPROACHES: a SURVEY. ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, 05(03), 946–952.

https://doi.org/10.21917/ijsc.2015.0133

52. Sen, P. C., Hajra, M., & Ghosh, M. (2019). Supervised Classification Algorithms in

Machine Learning: A Survey and review. In Advances in intelligent systems and

computing (pp. 99–111). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7403-6_11

53. A. Singh, N. Thakur and A. Sharma, "A review of supervised machine learning

algorithms," 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global

Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, India, 2016, pp. 1310-1315.

54. FY, O., JET, A., Awodele, O., O, H. J., Olakanmi, O., & Akinjobi, J. (2017). Supervised

Machine Learning Algorithms: Classification and comparison. International Journal of

Computer Trends and Technology, 48(3), 128–138.

https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v48p126

55. Ghahramani, Z. (2004). Unsupervised learning. In Lecture notes in computer science

(pp. 72–112). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_5

56. Naeem, S., Ali, A., Anam, S., & Ahmed, M. M. (2023). An Unsupervised Machine

Learning Algorithms: Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Computing and

Digital Systems, 13(1), 911–921. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/130172

57. H. U. Dike, Y. Zhou, K. K. Deveerasetty and Q. Wu, "Unsupervised Learning Based

On Artificial Neural Network: A Review," 2018 IEEE International Conference on

Cyborg and Bionic Systems (CBS), Shenzhen, China, 2018, pp. 322-327, doi:

10.1109/CBS.2018.8612259.

58. GfG. (2023, March 24). Semi-Supervised Learning in ML. GeeksforGeeks.

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/ml-semi-supervised-learning/

59. Van Engelen, J. E., & Hoos, H. H. (2019). A survey on semi-supervised learning.

Machine Learning, 109(2), 373–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6

60. Priyadharshini. (2024, March 27). What is machine learning and how does it work?

Simplilearn.com. https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/machine-learningtutorial/what-is-machine-learning#how_does_machine_learning_work

61. What Is Machine Learning and How Does It Work? (2024)

https://www.g2.com/articles/machine-learning

62. Habehh, H., & Gohel, S. (2021). Machine learning in healthcare. Current Genomics,

22(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389202922666210705124359

63. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Rab, S. (2022). Significance of

machine learning in healthcare: Features, pillars and applications. International Journal

of Intelligent Networks, 3, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin.2022.05.002

64. Rastogi, M., Vijarania, M., & Goel, N. (2022). Role of machine learning in healthcare

sector. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4195384

65. Khan, B., Fatima, H., Qureshi, A., Kumar, S., Hanan, A., Hussain, J., & Abdullah, S.

(2023). Drawbacks of artificial intelligence and their potential solutions in the

healthcare sector. Biomedical Materials & Devices, 1(2), 731–738.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-023-00063-2

66. Hassan, R., Alinsaif, S., Hossain, M. I., & Kamruzzaman, J. (2018). A machine learning

approach for prediction of pregnancy outcome following IVF treatment. Neural

Computing and Applications, 32(7), 2283–2297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-

3693-9

67. Qiu, J., Li, P., Dong, M., Xing, X., & Tan, J. (2019). Personalised prediction of live

birth prior to the first in vitro fertilisation treatment: a machine learning method.

Journal of Translational Medicine (Online), 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-

019-2062-5

68. Swain, J. E., Vermilye, M. T., Meseguer, M., & Ezcurra, D. (2020). AI in the treatment

of fertility: key considerations. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37(11),

2817–2824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01950-z

69. Zeadna, A., Khateeb, N., Rokach, L., Lior, Y., Har-Vardi, I., Harlev, A., Huleihel, M.,

Lunenfeld, E., & Levitas, E. (2020). Prediction of sperm extraction in non-obstructive

azoospermia patients: a machine-learning perspective. Human Reproduction, 35(7),

1505–1514. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa109

Downloads

Published

2026-09-22

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.