To determine and predict the success rate of various treatments in primarily infertile patients with the help of machine learning.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22878683Keywords:
Infertility, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Intrauterine Insemination (IUI), In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF), Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), Predictive Analytics, Reproductive HealthAbstract
Background: Infertility, defined as the inability to conceive after 12 months of
regular unprotected sexual intercourse, impacts millions of humans globally. This
condition not only challenges public health systems but also significantly affects
psychological and social well-being. Current therapeutic approaches vary in
accessibility and effectiveness, necessitating advancements in diagnostic and
treatment modalities. Machine learning (ML), a subset of artificial intelligence,
offers potential benefits in refining diagnostic accuracies and enhancing the
efficacy of infertility treatments through personalized care and predictive
analytics.
Methods: This study utilized machine learning algorithms to predict the success
rates of specific infertility treatments, including Intrauterine Insemination (IUI),
In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF), and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), among
a sample of primarily infertile patients. Retrospective and prospective data
spanning six months from 567 couples treated at Sunflower Hospital and Gayatri
Hospital were analyzed. ML models such as Decision Trees, Logistic Regression,
and XGBoost were applied, focusing on an array of predictive features including
patient age, infertility duration, previous medical and treatment histories, among
others. These features were rigorously selected based on their importance scores
derived from the ML algorithms to optimize the predictive performance.
Results and Discussion: The application of machine learning models
demonstrated significant potential in predicting the outcomes of infertility
treatments. The Decision Tree model exhibited a prediction accuracy of 85.54%
for IUI success rates, which was notably higher than the other models tested. For
IVF and ICSI treatments combined, the XGBoost model achieved an accuracy of
72.09%, indicating robust model performance in these more complex cases.
These models were effective in handling multifaceted data and yielded insights
that could assist in making informed clinical decisions. Notably, the Logistic
Regression model displayed substantial accuracy improvements over traditional
statistical methods, particularly in reducing the likelihood of false negatives,
thereby ensuring that fewer patients undergoing viable treatments were
incorrectly predicted to have poor outcomes.
Conclusions: Integrating machine learning into reproductive healthcare can substantially improve the precision of infertility treatment protocols, predict
treatment successes more accurately, and increase the overall efficacy of
interventions. This study underscores the transformative potential of ML in
healthcare, providing a framework for future applications in infertility treatment
and beyond. Continued research and development into these models are
recommended to confirm their effectiveness across different demographic and
geographical contexts and to explore their utility in other medical domains.substantially improve the precision of infertility treatment protocols, predict
treatment successes more accurately, and increase the overall efficacy of
interventions. This study underscores the transformative potential of ML in
healthcare, providing a framework for future applications in infertility treatment
and beyond. Continued research and development into these models are
recommended to confirm their effectiveness across different demographic and
geographical contexts and to explore their utility in other medical domains.
References
1. World Health Organization: WHO. (2023, April 3). Infertility.
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility
2. Rosenthal, L. (2023, January 19). What is the Difference Between Primary and
Secondary Infertility? illume fertility. https://www.illumefertility.com/fertilityblog/what-is-the-difference-between-primary-and-secondary-infertility
3. Magdum, M., Chowdhury, M. a. T., Begum, N., & Riya, S. (2022). Types of Infertility
and Its Risk Factors among Infertile Women: A Prospective Study in Dhaka City.
Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 10(04), 158–168.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2022.104014
4. Clearblue. (2024, March 11). Secondary infertility: What it is, why it happens and how
to cope. https://www.clearblue.com/how-to-get-pregnant/secondary-infertility
5. Secondary infertility: Why does it happen? (2022, December 7). Mayo Clinic.
6. World Health Organization. (2023). Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021
[Report]. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/366700/9789240068315-
eng.pdf?sequence=1
7. Bhattacharya, S., Harrild, K., Mollison, J., Wordsworth, S., Tay, C., Harrold, A.,
McQueen, D. B., Lyall, H., Johnston, L. M., Burrage, J., Grossett, S., Walton, H. J.,
Lynch, J., Johnstone, A., Kini, S., Raja, A., & Templeton, A. (2008). Clomifene citrate
or unstimulated intrauterine insemination compared with expectant management for
unexplained infertility: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. British Medical
Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 337(aug07 2), a716. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a716
8. Martínez, F., Racca, A., Rodríguez, I., & Polyzos, N. P. (2021). Ovarian stimulation for
oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update
(Print), 27(4), 673–696. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab008
9. Söderström‐Anttila, V., Wennerholm, U., Loft, A., Pinborg, A., Aittomäki, K.,
Romundstad, L. B., & Bergh, C. (2015). Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers,
children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update,
dmv046. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv046
10. Revised glossary on Assisted Reproductive Terminology (ART). (n.d.).
https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research-
%28srh%29/areas-of-work/fertility-care/ART-revised-glossary
11. Borght, M. V., & Wyns, C. (2018). Fertility and infertility: Definition and
epidemiology. Clinical Biochemistry, 62, 2–10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012
12. Agarwal, A., Mulgund, A., Hamada, A., & Chyatte, M. (2015). A unique view on male
infertility around the globe. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology,
13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1
13. Buckett, W., & Bentick, B. (1997). The epidemiology of infertility in a rural population.
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 76(3), 233–237.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.1997.tb07851.x
14. Professional, C. C. M. (n.d.). Infertility. Cleveland Clinic.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/16083-infertility
15. Deyhoul, N., Mohamaddoost, T., & Hosseini, M. (2017). Infertility-Related Risk
Factors: A Systematic review. International Journal of Women’s Health and
Reproduction Sciences, 5(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2017.05
16. Brazier, Y. (2023, December 22). Infertility in males and females.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/165748
17. Ejaculation Disorders | Center for Male Reproductive Medicine & Microsurgery.
(n.d.). https://maleinfertility.org/sexual-medicine/erectile-dysfunction-ed/ejaculationdisorders
18. Kumar, P., Kumar, N., Thakur, D., & Patidar, A. (2010). Male hypogonadism:
Symptoms and treatment. Agricultural Policy Paper, 1(3), 297.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0110-5558.72420
19. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism | Andrology Awareness Europe. (n.d.).
https://www.andrologyawareness.eu/hypogonadotropic-hypogonadism/
20. De Rosa, M., Zarrilli, S., Di Sarno, A., Milano, N., Gaccione, M., Boggia, B., Lombardi,
G., & Colao, A. (2003). Hyperprolactinemia in men: clinical and biochemical features
and response to treatment. Endocrine Journal, 20(1–2), 75–82.
https://doi.org/10.1385/endo:20:1-2:75
21. Krajewska-Kułak, E., & Sengupta, P. (2013). Thyroid function in male infertility.
Frontiers in Endocrinology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2013.00174
22. Sengupta, P., Dutta, S., Karkada, I. R., & Chinni, S. V. (2021). Endocrinopathies and
male infertility. Life (Basel), 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12010010
23. Ingleson, K. (2017, July 2). Klinefelter syndrome: What you need to know.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/318194
24. Facts about Hypospadias | CDC. (2023, June 28). Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/hypospadias.html
25. McIntosh, J. (2023, November 15). Everything you need to know about cystic fibrosis.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/147960
26. Goodman, E. (2021, April 7). What to know about radiation therapy.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/types-of-radiation-therapy
27. Koh, E., Sin, H., Fukushima, M., & Namiki, M. (2010). Azoospermia factor and male
infertility. Reproductive Medicine and Biology (Print), 9(3), 129–137.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-010-0055-4
28. Figure 1. Algorithm for azoospermia differential diagnosis. (n.d.). ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Algorithm-for-azoospermia-differentialdiagnosis_fig1_353300530
29. Campo, S., Campo, V., & Benagiano, G. (2012). Infertility and adenomyosis.
Obstetrics and Gynecology International (Online), 2012, 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/786132
44. In vitro fertilisation (IVF). (2021). In Cambridge University Press eBooks (pp. 95–113).
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108881760.010
45. ART Success Rates | CDC. (n.d.). https://www.cdc.gov/art/artdata/index.html
46. Machine Learning textbook. (n.d.).
https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/mitchell/ftp/mlbook.html
47. Naqa, I. E., & Murphy, M. J. (2015). What is machine learning? In Springer eBooks
(pp. 3–11). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18305-3_1
48. Peng, J., Jury, E. C., Dönnes, P., & Ciurtin, C. (2021). Machine Learning Techniques
for Personalised Medicine Approaches in Immune-Mediated Chronic Inflammatory
Diseases: Applications and Challenges. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.720694
49. Kanade, V. (2022, August 30). What is machine learning? Understanding types &
applications - Spiceworks. Spiceworks. https://www.spiceworks.com/tech/artificialintelligence/articles/what-is-ml/
50. Nasteski, V. (2017). An overview of the supervised machine learning methods.
Horizonti. Serija B. Prirodno-matematički, Tehničko-tehnološki, Biotehnički,
Medicinski Nauki I Zdravstvo (Print), 4, 51–62.
https://doi.org/10.20544/horizons.b.04.1.17.p05
51. Muhammad, I., & Zhu, Y. (2015). SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING
APPROACHES: a SURVEY. ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, 05(03), 946–952.
https://doi.org/10.21917/ijsc.2015.0133
52. Sen, P. C., Hajra, M., & Ghosh, M. (2019). Supervised Classification Algorithms in
Machine Learning: A Survey and review. In Advances in intelligent systems and
computing (pp. 99–111). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7403-6_11
53. A. Singh, N. Thakur and A. Sharma, "A review of supervised machine learning
algorithms," 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global
Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, India, 2016, pp. 1310-1315.
54. FY, O., JET, A., Awodele, O., O, H. J., Olakanmi, O., & Akinjobi, J. (2017). Supervised
Machine Learning Algorithms: Classification and comparison. International Journal of
Computer Trends and Technology, 48(3), 128–138.
https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v48p126
55. Ghahramani, Z. (2004). Unsupervised learning. In Lecture notes in computer science
(pp. 72–112). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_5
56. Naeem, S., Ali, A., Anam, S., & Ahmed, M. M. (2023). An Unsupervised Machine
Learning Algorithms: Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Computing and
Digital Systems, 13(1), 911–921. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/130172
57. H. U. Dike, Y. Zhou, K. K. Deveerasetty and Q. Wu, "Unsupervised Learning Based
On Artificial Neural Network: A Review," 2018 IEEE International Conference on
Cyborg and Bionic Systems (CBS), Shenzhen, China, 2018, pp. 322-327, doi:
10.1109/CBS.2018.8612259.
58. GfG. (2023, March 24). Semi-Supervised Learning in ML. GeeksforGeeks.
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/ml-semi-supervised-learning/
59. Van Engelen, J. E., & Hoos, H. H. (2019). A survey on semi-supervised learning.
Machine Learning, 109(2), 373–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6
60. Priyadharshini. (2024, March 27). What is machine learning and how does it work?
Simplilearn.com. https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/machine-learningtutorial/what-is-machine-learning#how_does_machine_learning_work
61. What Is Machine Learning and How Does It Work? (2024)
https://www.g2.com/articles/machine-learning
62. Habehh, H., & Gohel, S. (2021). Machine learning in healthcare. Current Genomics,
22(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389202922666210705124359
63. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Rab, S. (2022). Significance of
machine learning in healthcare: Features, pillars and applications. International Journal
of Intelligent Networks, 3, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin.2022.05.002
64. Rastogi, M., Vijarania, M., & Goel, N. (2022). Role of machine learning in healthcare
sector. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4195384
65. Khan, B., Fatima, H., Qureshi, A., Kumar, S., Hanan, A., Hussain, J., & Abdullah, S.
(2023). Drawbacks of artificial intelligence and their potential solutions in the
healthcare sector. Biomedical Materials & Devices, 1(2), 731–738.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-023-00063-2
66. Hassan, R., Alinsaif, S., Hossain, M. I., & Kamruzzaman, J. (2018). A machine learning
approach for prediction of pregnancy outcome following IVF treatment. Neural
Computing and Applications, 32(7), 2283–2297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-
3693-9
67. Qiu, J., Li, P., Dong, M., Xing, X., & Tan, J. (2019). Personalised prediction of live
birth prior to the first in vitro fertilisation treatment: a machine learning method.
Journal of Translational Medicine (Online), 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-
019-2062-5
68. Swain, J. E., Vermilye, M. T., Meseguer, M., & Ezcurra, D. (2020). AI in the treatment
of fertility: key considerations. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37(11),
2817–2824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01950-z
69. Zeadna, A., Khateeb, N., Rokach, L., Lior, Y., Har-Vardi, I., Harlev, A., Huleihel, M.,
Lunenfeld, E., & Levitas, E. (2020). Prediction of sperm extraction in non-obstructive
azoospermia patients: a machine-learning perspective. Human Reproduction, 35(7),
1505–1514. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa109
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Manan S. Popat, Dr. Tanay Patel, Dr. Rutvi Patel, Dr. Dhwani Patel, Dr. Nilesh Kanzariya (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in ClinSphere Journals are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.
This license permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, reproduction, adaptation, and commercial use of the published work in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the original source, a link to the Creative Commons license is provided, and any changes made are clearly indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant ClinSphere Journals a non-exclusive license to publish, archive, index, and disseminate the article.
To view a copy of this license, visit:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/